Mechanisms of regenerative preconditioning in pigs with subtotal hepatectomies.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein occlusion shortly before extended hepatic resections has hepatoprotective properties, but its molecular effects have not been elucidated. We characterized the impact of regenerative preconditioning by portal vein embolization (PVE) on hepatic energy metabolism and cytokine expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 90% hepatectomies were performed in normal pigs (Control) and in pigs that underwent a PVE 24 h before the surgery (n = 10/group). Blood biochemistry and coagulation, liver damage, liver function (ICG), hepatic content of adenine nucleotides, and hepatic expression of inflammatory mediators (RT-PCR and WB) were determined before the hepatectomy, 15 min, and 24 h later. RESULTS: All PVE and hepatectomies were successfully accomplished. The 90% hepatectomy resulted in: Immediate reduction of ATP, leading to persistent decreases of energy load and ATP/ADP ratio up to the 24-h time-point; and pro-inflammatory expression profile of cytokines in the remnant liver. Prior performance of PVE attenuated the bioenergetic alterations and prevented many of the changes in hepatic cytokine expression. CONCLUSIONS: Regenerative preconditioning by PVE improved hepatic energy metabolism and modulated inflammatory mediators in the remnant liver in pigs undergoing major hepatectomies, potentially contributing to its hepatoprotective effects.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la oclusión de la vena porta precoz antes de hepatectomías extendidas tiene propiedades hepatoprotectoras, pero sus efectos moleculares no se han aclarado. Caracterizamos el impacto del preacondicionamiento regenerativo por embolización de la vena porta (PVE) sobre el metabolismo energético hepático y la expresión de citocinas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos hepatectomías del 90% en cerdos (Control) y en cerdos sometidos a PVE 24 horas antes de la cirugía (n = 10/grupo). La bioquímica y la coagulación, el daño hepático, la función hepática (ICG), los nucleótidos de adenina y la expresión de mediadores inflamatorios (RT-PCR y WB) fueron determinado antes de la hepatectomía, quince minutos y 24 horas después. RESULTADOS: Las PVE y las hepatectomías se realizaron con éxito. La hepatectomía del 90% resultó en: una reducción del ATP, lo que disminuye la carga energética y la relación ATP/ADP a las 24 horas; y en la expresión de citocinas proinflamatorias. La realización previa de PVE atenuó las alteraciones bioenergéticas y evitó muchos de los cambios en la expresión de citocinas. CONCLUSIONES: El preacondicionamiento regenerativo con PVE mejoró el metabolismo energético y moduló los mediadores inflamatorios en el hígado remanente en cerdos sometidos a hepatectomías subtotales, contribuyendo potencialmente a sus efectos hepatoprotectores.

Comprehensive Characterization of a Porcine Model of The "Small-for-Flow" Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The term "Small-for-Flow" reflects the pathogenetic relevance of hepatic hemodynamics for the "Small-For-Size" syndrome and posthepatectomy liver failure. We aimed to characterize a large-animal model for studying the "Small-for-Flow" syndrome. METHODS: We performed subtotal (90%) hepatectomies in 10 female MiniPigs using a simplified transection technique with a tourniquet. Blood tests, hepatic and systemic hemodynamics, and hepatic function and histology were assessed before (Bas), 15 min (t-15 min) and 24 h (t-24 h) after the operation. Some pigs underwent computed tomography (CT) scans for hepatic volumetry (n = 4) and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (n = 3). Postoperative care was performed in an intensive care unit environment. RESULTS: All hepatectomies were successfully performed, and hepatic volumetry confirmed liver remnant volumes of 9.2% [6.2-11.2]. The hepatectomy resulted in characteristic hepatic hemodynamic alterations, including portal hyperperfusion, relative decrease of hepatic arterial blood flow, and increased portal pressure (PP) and portal-systemic pressure gradient. The model reproduced major diagnostic features including the development of cholestasis, coagulopathy, encephalopathy with increased ICP, ascites, and renal failure, hyperdynamic circulation, and hyperlactatemia. Two animals (20%) died before t-24 h. Histological liver damage was observed at t-15 min and at t-24 h. The degree of histological damage at t-24 h correlated with intraoperative PP (r = 0.689, p = 0.028), hepatic arterial blood flow (r = 0.655, p = 0.040), and hepatic arterial pulsatility index (r = 0.724, p = 0.066). All animals with intraoperative PP > 20 mmHg presented liver damage at t-24 h. CONCLUSION: The present 90% hepatectomy porcine experimental model is a feasible and reproducible model for investigating the "Small-for-Flow" syndrome.

Preconditioning by portal vein embolization modulates hepatic hemodynamics and improves liver function in pigs with extended hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization is performed weeks before extended hepatic resections to increase the future liver remnant and prevent posthepatectomy liver failure. Portal vein embolization performed closer to the operation also could be protective, but worsening of portal hyper-perfusion is a major concern. We determined the hepatic hemodynamic effects of a portal vein embolization performed 24 hours prior to hepatic operation. METHODS: An extended (90%) hepatectomy was performed in swine undergoing (portal vein embolization) or not undergoing (control) a portal vein embolization 24 hours earlier (n = 10/group). Blood tests, hepatic and systemic hemodynamics, hepatic function (plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green), liver histology, and volumetry (computed tomographic scanning) were assessed before and after the hepatectomy. Hepatocyte proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression and hepatic gene expression also were evaluated. RESULTS: Swine in the control and portal vein embolization groups maintained stable systemic hemodynamics and developed similar increases of portal blood flow (302 ± 72% vs 486 ± 92%, P = .13). Portal pressure drastically increased in Controls (from 9.4 ± 1.3 mm Hg to 20.9 ± 1.4 mm Hg, P < .001), while being markedly attenuated in the portal vein embolization group (from 11.4 ± 1.5 mm Hg to 16.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg, P = .061). The procedure also improved the preservation of the hepatic artery blood flow, liver function, and periportal edema. These effects occurred in the absence of hepatocyte proliferation or hepatic growth and were associated with the induction of the vasoprotective gene Klf2. CONCLUSION: Portal vein embolization preconditioning represents a potential hepato-protective strategy for extended hepatic resections. Further preclinical studies should assess its medium-term effects, including survival. Our study also supports the relevance of hepatic hemodynamics as the main pathogenetic factor of post-hepatectomy liver failure.